opinion

.XXX Registrars to Profit from Trademark Blocking

MickeyMouse.xxx, anyone?

.XXX administrator ICM Registry and its partner IPRota have issued a white paper outlining the cost to trademark and rights holders that would like to block their brands from being registered in the adult-only domain.

The white paper was published this morning – lo and behold, because trademark holders will be forced to deal with registrars and not permitted to go to ICM directly, prices will vary – but the projected price for those that choose to block during the “sunrise” period, is $300 per address! IPRota’s announcement was scheduled to coincide with the annual International Trademark Association meeting being held this week. After the sunrise, things will apparently get much darker and potentially much more expensive.

So, that means that notoriously protective brands like Disney will potentially be forced to pay to block hundreds of .XXX addresses, in order to protect their brands. Fox senior vice president Mei-lan Stark was quoted in an article posted on WorldTrademarkReview.com, saying that the company is looking at 300 or 400 addresses that would have to be defensively blocked. Then, Stark added that if another 400 gTLDs were added to the Internet and Fox decided to defensively block on each domain, for each address, the annual cost could end up somewhere around $12 million.

Perhaps Stark is projecting a worst case scenario, but the logic makes sense. At this point, what’s to stop the precedent-setting money grab for ICM and its affiliated registrars now that .XXX has been approved by ICANN? The competition has already started as another article at RedOrbit.com announced today that registrar DomainMonster.com has blocking for trademark holders at $149.50 – more than double the wholesale price being offered by ICM for .XXX addresses. Folks that want to purchase .XXX domains from DomainMonster.com during the general availability period will find prices “starting” at $74.99.

We also would like to point out that the only company involved in the .XXX debacle that has changed to a .XXX address is ICM – and at this rate, they’ll be the only ones that can afford the annual fees. Not only will mainstream trademark and rights holders be paying to protect their businesses – adult online businesses are in an even worse position. How many addresses will you have to block, in order to prevent cyber-squatting and protect your traffic?

And when the mainstream online businesses realize how much this added extra .XXX expense could cost them, guess who they’re going to blame? The big, bad, evil “multi-billion dollar” adult industry. The folks at Amazon and Apple don’t know that the adult industry didn’t want this Top Level Domain either. And neither does India or Kenya, or any countries with anti-pornography policies. Just last week, Europe told the U.S. Dept of Commerce that there needs to be more transparency with Internet regulator ICANN, resulting from the .XXX approval – so we’re thinking the EU isn’t about to jump on the .XXX bandwagon.

FSC urges all adult online business owners to stay .COM – say NO to .XXX. We have led the opposition to .XXX because we believe that its bad for business and bad for the Internet. You worked hard to build your brand – do you want to pay Beverly Hills prices for an address in the adult-only online ghetto? Is it realistic to think that a .XXX address will attract enough traffic to cover your annual fees – or is it more likely that the registrars will be laughing all the way to the bank? – jc

(Photo courtesy of Bwmoll3)

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Breaking Down HB 805 and How it Affects the Adult Industry

North Carolina House Bill 805 was enacted July 29, after the state legislature overrode Governor Josh Stein’s veto. The provisions that relate to the adult industry, imposing requirements for age verification, consent and content removal, are scheduled to become effective Dec. 1. Platforms have until then to update their policies and systems to comply with the new regulations.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

How to Avoid Copyright Pitfalls When Using Music in Adult Content

When creating an adult video, bringing your vision to life often means assembling just the right ingredients — including the right music. However, adding music to adult content can raise complex legal and ethical issues.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
profile

Dan Leal Talks Balance, Business and Daily Rituals

“We were in a big field, and I hopped off a little ledge to cut through some grass, and my knee just gave out,” he explains. “I thought it was my calf because I’d torn my calf muscle back in December, but I had an MRI that confirmed a torn ACL.”

Jeff Dana ·
profile

Sarah Illustrates Spins Chill Vibes Into Viral Fame

Lounging in her sunny SoCal backyard in between content shoots, with her hair swept into a no-fuss ponytail and the sun dappling her shoulders, Sarah Illustrates looks every bit the hot mom next door — because, well, she is. The kind of mom who bakes fresh bread on the weekends, juggles dance recitals and baseball games, and delights in life’s simpler joys, like family time and trips to Target.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

Nade Nasty on Balancing Kink and Care Behind the Camera

Don’t let the name fool you. Onscreen, Nade Nasty projects the larger-than-life personality of a chaotic showman occupying a world that is strange, specific and entirely his own. Offscreen, however, he’s a thoughtful, detail-oriented creator — who just happens to have a serious flair for the eccentric.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

Fighting Back Against AI-Fueled Fake Takedown Notices

The digital landscape is increasingly being shaped by artificial intelligence, and while AI offers immense potential, it’s also being weaponized. One disturbing trend that directly impacts adult businesses is AI-powered “DMCA takedown services” generating a flood of fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

What the New SCOTUS Ruling Means for AV Laws and Free Speech

On June 27, 2025, the United States Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, upholding Texas’ age verification law in the face of a constitutional challenge and setting a new precedent that bolsters similar laws around the country.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
profile

Andi Avalon Talks Wifey Life and the Joys of Suburban Chaos

Fans crave authenticity. For most adult content creators, this has become gospel. Everybody is looking for “the real deal” — and as it happens, you can’t get much more real than MILF creator-performer Andi Avalon.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

How the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act Could Impact Adult Businesses

Congress is considering a bill that would change the well-settled definition of obscenity and create extensive new risks for the adult industry. The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee, makes a mockery of the First Amendment and should be roundly rejected.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
profile

Sophia Locke Talks Second Acts and Self-Love

Sophia Locke has the kind of presence that instantly makes you want to lean in. She’s confident, effortlessly glamorous and exudes sincerity. Chatting with her feels like catching up over lattes with your best friend — who happens to casually drop that she’s filming three Adult Time features next month.

Jackie Backman ·
Show More